學術資源整合系統-相關推薦
 |
|
|
|
|
| 作者 | Chen, Shu-Juo |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 20180517 |
|---|
| 著作名稱 | Does Taiwan need a law like NAGPRA?
|
|---|
| 會議名稱 | NAISA Tenth Annual Meeting |
|---|
| 會議地點 | Los Angles, USA |
|---|
| 主辦單位 | Native American & Indigenous Studies Association |
|---|
| 國際性會議 | Y |
|---|
| 主題 | 民族 |
|---|
| 關鍵字 | cultural heritages, indigenous peoples, Museum Act, Cultural Heritage Preservation Act, Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, National Museum of the American Indian |
|---|
| 摘要 | Taiwan’s indigenous peoples have undergone hundreds of years of outside rule, and their cultural heritages continue to face deep crises. During the past 50 years, the government’s objectives regarding indigenous peoples’ development have been indecisive and uncertain. In the meantime, indigenous peoples have had to play a passive role, as of yet unable to make strategic decisions for them. Post-constitutional reform, the government promised to protect indigenous societies’ diversity and respect their autonomy. However, by that time, indigenous society was already nearing collapse, and cultural heritages had long since been either abandoned under duress or added to the collections of institutions and museums. Within tribes, experts in traditional knowledge are dying out, and the process of passing on cultural heritage is rife with difficulties.Recently, despite the passage of the Museum Act and amendment of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act, both with a few clauses specifically addressing the preservation of indigenous cultural heritages, the real-world management and carrying out of these clauses continues to lack the participation of indigenous peoples. Furthermore, the aforementioned clauses gave not a mention to the repatriation of indigenous tribal artifacts, emphasizing that indigenous peoples are still far from having ultimate authority over the management of their own cultural heritage. |
|---|
| 系統號 | NO000005085 |
|---|
|
|